How to get consent for your development in 6 to 8 weeks

The consenting process doesn’t need to be a headache. This quick guide outlines our unique approach to the consenting process that gets a quick, successful outcome – every time.

By submitting this form, you agree to be registered to our emailing list and receiving the latest news and information we have to offer

Getting started on development

Why The Consenting Process Goes Pear-Shaped – Through the eyes of an Ex-Council Planner

Before starting The Development Collective, I worked as a Planner for 15 years in both Local Government and the Private Sector.

During those years I became passionate about delivering strong design outcomes and challenging conventional processes.

However, it was my seven years as a Council Planner that gave me an understanding as to why the consenting process can go so wrong. I witnessed just how long and stressful getting consent could be for Applicants if they didn’t approach the process correctly.

Over the years this experience motivated me to try and fix the problem.

There are three parts to the Consenting Process:

  1. Pre-application Meeting
  2. Pre-lodgement Stage
  3. Processing Stage

The pre-lodgement stage is an important first step. I always felt that the point of the pre-lodgement meeting was more to gather knowledge and find out from Council about what’s possible on a site. This seemed logical to me as it positioned Council Planners as team members rather and contributors to the process rather than hurdles.

However, it seemed that time and time again Developers and Architects would come into Council with the aim to argue for their design or development.Fully rendered designs and completed concepts worth thousands of dollars were presented to us all the time.
The expectation was that we would be as impressed with the outcome as they were and rush it through the approval process.

We never were.

You see, Council Planners are experienced, qualified professionals with a deep understanding of the constraints of a particular site and council policies and processes.

It is the job of the Council Planner at the pre-lodgement stage to contribute the process and offer sound advice around what is and isn’t possible on a site.

It’s also an opportunity for them to present information which may not be readily available to the wider public (flood reporting and land stability reporting for example). The objective is to provide the development team with the knowledge they need to design for the specified site.

When an almost final design was presented at the pre-lodgement stage, it was usually a recipe for disaster for the Applicant as often certain matters were not adequately addressed. In many cases, this approach would often result in significant redesign costs and consenting delays, as information was uncovered that they didn’t know about and therefore needed to be addressed.

The few Applicants who came into Council with a more collaborative approach from the outset always seemed to end up being involved in a more fluid process. They generally obtained consent far quicker than those who didn’t.

Another recurring issue I observed was the siloed nature many Consultants tended to work. There was limited to no communication during the initial stages of the development process. Architects tended to focus on architecture, Planners on planning, Engineers on engineering. I always found this surprising as it went against the grain of our social nature and our ability to communicate effectively with our peers.

Sometimes when Consultants don’t understand the finer detail of each other’s requirements, holes appear in the process and miscommunication issues can arise. This also causes consenting and other important timelines to blow out.

For example – if your Architect doesn’t have a thorough understanding of the construction process and costs – certain detailing and design elements can significantly eat into profits.

I believe Applicants need to ensure that the Consultants they select for their projects work together as a team, collaborate effectively and also have a good understanding of each other’s requirements.

Co-operative lateral thinking and engagement with Council Officers and Consultants will initiate successful development processes and obtain quicker approvals. Equally important is the need for an experienced coordinator who can glue all the moving parts together. It’s this combination that will make sure the development process is a success. 

Bayard McKenzie has over 15 years of planning experience for private and government organisations. He is the co-founder of The Development Collective – a revolutionary property development service that supports developers through the entire process from consent and design through to completion.

How to get consent in 6 to 8 weeks

Our unique approach to the consenting process gets a quick, successful outcome – every time. Learn how with our free guide.

Similar Advice

A Perfect Storm for Auckland Developers

Why you need to take advantage of the new LVR requirements and buyer’s market now At the end of last…

Why you need to take advantage of the new LVR requirements and buyer’s market now At the end of last year, the Reserve Bank made some alterations to the loan to value ratios (LVR) that banks typically use when lending for mortgages. The new LVR restrictions have been loosened enabling developers to borrow 65% of a property’s value (up from 60%).  …

What Impact Will a Labour Government Have on the Auckland Property Market?

This video looks at the impact the change in political…

The Real Solution to the Affordable Housing Crisis Facing Auckland

The answer lies in freeing up land by offering better living solutions for Baby Boomers There seems to be a…

The answer lies in freeing up land by offering better living solutions for Baby Boomers There seems to be a misconception about how we achieve affordable housing in Auckland. This being that you simply find a bit of land, limit construction costs as much as possible and in doing so, you’ll get the magical sales number of $550,000 to $650,000.…